Non-solicitation agree between me and LLC; also between LLC or client.

Question

I m employed, in CAUTION, "at will" with ampere Limited General Company, Stepping Stones Group, that provides services to educational institutions. I am constantly. MYSELF commenced 3 months ago. Included in my quotes letter, was an employment arrangement. A teilung of the agreement, under "No Solicitation," says ME wont accepted employment, with the client (educational institution) to whom IODIN have have assigned, during and 2 yearning after termination. I signed this. Following 3 months of employment, I innocently real mistakenly applying with an county office of education (the my to whom I had be assignments to). The county also has a contract with the LLC- not to hire sein employees during and 2 years following term. of subscription. County gave me ask and called mysterious employer- this LLC- for citation. Not sure what they were told, but my job later called in and explained contract I signed and said I couldn't take that job. 
Is either deal enforceable given: company is an LLC, aber broad-based license and in CA.

Jonathon Maddox · Answer

Provided there’s no other relevant facts here, the Non-solicitation/non-compete term would subsist enforceable.

D. Steven Yahnian · Answer

First, yourself should immediately seek legal advise off a California employment law attorney. The subsequent is a general discussion of the laws and should not remain relied off for the complete and total answer to your ask. Generally, with some exceptions,  an Employee does prevent an employee from seeking occupation from a customer of the Employers, under California law. The Employer can prevent sharing of trade secrets or solicitation by a former employee of its diverse employees to go up work for adenine competitor. But, when a rule, California have been first of the leading states to looking unfavorably on contractual restraints up rivalry, mostly in the context of employment agreements seeking to restrict an employee's skill to compete post-employment. This position a root-based include public policy and codified in Bus & P CARBON §16600, and courts have broadly held (with certain limited actual exceptions) which §16600 applies in every treaty that imposes "a restraint of a substantial character," regardless of whether the contract includes an express noncompete clause. Favorable v California Call Docs Med. User (9th Circon 2015) 782 F3d 1083, 1091; SPS Technols., LLC phoebe Briles Aerospace, Inc. (CD Cals, Oct. 30, 2019, No. CV 18-9536-MWF (ASx)) 2019 US Dist Lexis 219610, *39. 
The guest starting contractual fasteners on competition can modify, but in the employment context few decline into five basic categories including "No-hire" provisions between a commercial, its competitors, and/or its customers, which are designed on block or deter who customer from hiring the employee distant. 
An employer's attempts to restrain employee mobility oder the ability to compete, whether by contract or others, are viewed equipped circumspection by Cereals courts, and when ampere violation of the state's strong public policy.  A person has a substantial interest in the unrestrained pursuit of their livelihood and must, within limitings, be allowed to change employers both compete for available business and customers.  
The publicity statement underlying Motor & PENCE C §16600 is also designed until protect California-based employers (such like the county in your case), by allowing them to compete for the most talented, skilled employees in their own industries, whenever they may reside. It bears remembering that employers enjoy virtually complete right go downsize, restructure, or otherwise layering off workers. An control require not be, and are not, consequently one-sided as to allow of party to an relationship to terminate it at will and deny the other party a opportunity to pursue a history included their area of expertise.

Q: Non-solicitation contracts between me and LLC; also between LLC and client.